History of the Barnes Seminar
Background
“I’ve been a community college teacher since 1972 and this seminar is the best professional development I ever did from when I was first a participant in 1987 to the very last time I participated. It is almost magic,” commented Elaine Folkers at the 25th-anniversary celebration. Every person from the first seminar who attended the 25th anniversary echoed identical sentiments. So how did this magic begin?
The Spring Seminar (the original name) was the first activity of the Connecticut Center for Teaching. While the Seminar began in 1987, its roots go back to the early 1960s because it is a Great Teacher style seminar. The basic format of these seminars comes from two related strands.
The first strand, called Master Teacher seminars, was designed by Roger Garrison and began in 1962 at Westbrook College in Maine. For many years, Greenfield Community College operated a program based upon this model and some faculty from Connecticut attended. Our own program was originally modeled on the Greenfield Seminar for Master Teachers.
The second strand, called Great Teacher seminars, is based upon Garrison’s model. David Gottshall, out of the College of DuPage, developed this model first as the Illinois Great Teachers Seminar. The best known current programs using this model are both ones that our Center for Teaching had a close relationship with in the past: the Hawaii National Great Teachers Seminar (we even traded staff for several years) and the Canadian Rockies National Great Teachers Seminar.
The two program models share most characteristics and beliefs – that teachers can help other teachers more than any expert can, that too much structure gets in the way, that less formal interaction is often the best way to get someone energized. There was, however, one significant difference. Originally, Great Teacher seminars had more planned group discussions, while Master Teacher seminars had a more open structure where participants and staff actually built the seminar as it happened. That distinction disappeared many years ago. Today the term ‘Great Teachers Seminar’ is used almost exclusively.
The Early Years
The Spring/Barnes Seminar concept was brought to Connecticut by the first head of the Center for Teaching, LeRoy Barnes of Middlesex. Actually, the first retreat using the Great Teacher model wasn’t even for faculty! The Steering Committee created to form the new Center for Teaching was seemingly hopelessly deadlocked between top administrators and faculty over the structure of the new Center. LeRoy, with assistance from Holly Bristol (Northwestern) and Bill Searle (Asnuntuck), ran a Great Board Retreat in the fall of 1987. Existing members of the nascent Steering Committee spent a long weekend discussing ways to improve teaching using the same format that Barnes was to adopt. With each person talking about successful teaching and learning, and concentrating on the positive, members found common ground. This retreat produced the current structure of the Center for Teaching.
The success of that endeavor led LeRoy to suggest that the first teaching program sponsored by the new Center for Teaching be the same style workshop in the spring of 1988. Notes indicate that, initially, it was a struggle to get the hoped-for attendance of three faculty members per college. Few knew what this new seminar style was like. However, once word spread that this would be teacher-led, practical, and focused on what was possible, colleges quickly filled their allotted slots. In fact, there were 18 people on the waiting list.
Clearly, the new Spring Seminar was hugely important. The seminar marked the first large project of the new Center for Teaching in its first year. Did it work? Participants were so excited that many wrote letters to their Presidents and Andrew McKirdy, the head of the community college system. Their enthusiasm for the seminar and comments such as “this uplifting, rewarding conference,” “a definitive sense of community was generated,” and “exciting and productive,” helped solidify support for the new Center for Teaching. Participants even lobbied successfully for the Center for Teaching to run a reunion weekend retreat in February of 1989 for the ’88 attendees. “We loved it. I’d been at Tunxis for 15 years already, and this was a new approach to professional development – totally relevant” was Ellie Lowell’s comment at the 25th anniversary.
Basic Philosophy
What is at the heart of a Great Teachers style seminar? David Gottshall, in a North American Council for Staff, Program and Organizational Development (NCSPOD) publication, “In Search of Great Retreats,” says this:
“The Great Teachers Seminars are based on four premises:
1. In the long run, teachers learn to teach best from one another. Properly facilitated shop talk can be the highest form of staff development.
2. Creativity in teaching is enhanced by mixing teachers of diverse fields, experience levels, and interests.
3. If properly tapped, the collective wisdom, experience and creativity of any group of practicing educators far surpasses that of any individual expert of any stature or fame.
4. The key to success in teaching is simplification (less is more).”
Other key points?
A. Rigid, minimal structure as LeRoy Barnes often said. This means that while there is no control over the content of discussions, discussion groups start and end on time, and everyone is expected to be on time.
B. Less is more. “Leaving lots of time for people to connect, meet others informally and develop personal relationships is a key to Barnes’ success” said Alice Burstein, former seminar coordinator. Great Teacher Seminars are primarily oriented toward helping participants believe that they can control many aspects of their teaching and that working together with other teachers, they can change conditions for their students, in their classrooms, in their colleges.
C. Take responsibility for your learning and your time. This one needs no explanation, but it also means that participants are encouraged to join or leave groups that are not serving their needs.
D. Use free time. Participants are strongly encouraged to relax, do fun activities, and to enjoy the time they have. However they are also expected to do these things with others, and to continue the discussions about learning.
E. Equality. There is no hierarchy of teachers or expertise; everyone is equal, from the newest part-time faculty member to the most experienced full-time faculty member. We are all experts.
F. No complaining, grousing, or griping. The phrase “let’s stay on Mt Positive” is one that all staff members learn and use!
Has Barnes Changed?
“Listening to these teachers talk about what they are doing and how they are doing it brings me back 25 years. It could easily have been us,” commented Mushiba (Asnuntuck) on the evening of the 25th anniversary celebration. She was right. While there have been changes to the Barnes structure over the years, they have not been significant. The schedule for the second seminar (unfortunately, no copies of the schedule for the first one have been found, although memos for the second indicate that the staff kept the same schedule) is remarkably similar to the current schedule; most aspects have remained the same.
At the heart of all Great Teacher workshops is participants sharing ideas in small groups about what works for them, concentrating on what is positive and practical. The strictures against complaining, railing against the forces that make teachers crazy, talking about bureaucracy, complaining about students, and giving up have stayed the same.
All Great Teacher seminars start with people in small groups sharing what works for them (called an innovation), then move to individual problems that participants face that they want ideas about from their colleagues. As one participant said, “I got so much encouragement to go ahead and try something, see what works with MY students, in MY classroom, with MY style. Wow! Even in the challenges session, everyone was positive and sharing ideas about what might work, or what has worked for them when they faced a similar situation.”
The challenges session mentioned above identifies one other change since the early years. At first the problem in teaching that people brought was a problem that they believed they had at least partially solved and simply wanted more input on. While Peter Anderheggan (Housatonic) was leader, the challenge was revised to be something unsolved that individuals wanted input on. In response to requests for more sharing of innovations during the first couple of years, in most years there have been at least two sessions where innovations are shared. Some years have had two challenge sessions; some have had one.
The third component that every seminar has shared is the hot topics session, or — as it is now most recently titled — the compelling conversations session. These are topics that participants wish to explore in more depth with colleagues at the seminar, often generated during earlier innovation or challenge sessions. Sharing across colleges often highlights different practices, which sometimes opens a wide range of possible solutions. What is seen as a rule within the culture of one college might be quite malleable at another. The number of compelling conversation sessions has changed, with some seminars having two, others only one.
The biggest single change from the first Barnes Seminars is that for about the first decade they included five-minute teaching demonstrations. These were eliminated during Alice Burstein’s (Middlesex) tenure as coordinator, as being not as helpful as having more small group discussions.
Mornings now start earlier, and afternoon breaks are longer. The breaks have always been an integral part of the Barnes experience. A key purpose of the small group sessions is to provoke ideas that can later be explored by those most interested in them. Participants are actively encouraged to spend free time talking informally. “Making contact with colleagues from different colleges is one of the most important aspects of Barnes. We never get the opportunity to just sit and talk, other than here,” commented Nancy Kelly (Middlesex) at the 25th anniversary.
The evening session on the first day of the seminar has changed regularly over the years, sometimes being a formal session, often not. For several years there was community viewing of a video on teaching followed by informal discussions. Today there is often a Non-Astounding Teaching Tips session, frequently a large-group session on day two.
In the early 1990’s to help set a playful tone there was an informal play with a teaching theme largely put on by staff and written by LeRoy. Later, there was often a hilarious team competition skit depicting what a great teacher does. More recently, there has been a creative poetry exercise, focused on teaching. Singing, often without enough good voices, has been a popular evening activity. These fun, team building activities are designed to bring people together, celebrate similarities and build bonds.
Briefly in the 1990’s and again recently there has been a reflective session late on the second day. During this time, participants reflect upon a topic, write about it, and then discuss their responses in small groups. Topics such as “how has teaching changed me,” and “what is the best thing I have done as a teacher” set the tone.
The morning of the final day has varied within a narrow range. Originally there were open discussions about what great teaching is and what a great teacher does. Larry Fujinaka, director of the Hawaii Great Teacher Seminar, brought the idea of the ‘talking stick’ to Connecticut when he was a member of the Barnes staff. From staffers who had attended either the Hawaii or Canadian Rockies seminars came the idea of individual sharing of “what inspires me about teaching,” which often became quite emotional. Lately the topic has been more like “what are you taking from the Barnes experience.” Wearing a lei at the last session and placing it in a common pile after speaking also is from Hawaii; this action is both symbolic and practical as each speaker then hands the talking stick to someone who still has her/his lei on.
“I have an Instant Survey. How many people here post an online assignment in case of bad weather?” No explanation of where the seminar
has been would be complete without mentioning that the Instant Survey became a fixture by the late 1990’s. This is a popular, very quick way for participants to see how many people actually do, or do not do, a particular thing. Staff members encourage this because it is another tool to break the “no one has this problem but me” syndrome. Individuals also use this to identify who might be interested in further conversation on a subject of interest.
And fun. Lots and lots of fun. Games. Sharing jokes. Kidding – emphasis on the positive! For example, many attendees during the years when the seminar was at the Mercy Center remember the buildings being locked at 11:00. Too early! “Oh, the locked door. We had to make sure one of the staff had a room on the first floor so we could boost someone in through the window. It kind of gave us away when we started putting a lawn chair outside a bedroom window to make it easier” recalled Steve Mark (Housatonic) at the 25th anniversary.
Gifting became a Barnes tradition also in the 1990’s. Some say it started as a way for certain staff to unload old children’s toys, but this has been denied! The first day of the seminar everyone draws another participant’s name out of a hat. There is a huge pile of stuff, mostly not items to be cherished, that can be used as gifts. Each person makes a public presentation before the full group of his/her gift to the person selected. Comments range from the hilarious to reflective. Gifting happens at every full group discussion, and assists in promoting the informal, leadership-is-shared approach.
Seminar Staff
“I remember when I got appointed to lead the first one. I had raised my hand that I’d attended the Greenfield Master Teacher Seminar, and LeRoy said to me, ‘then you’ll be our leader,’ and that was that”, said David Hopcroft (Quinebaug Valley) during the 25th anniversary celebration. Staff of that first seminar were LeRoy Barnes, Holly Bristol and Bill Searle. In year two, LeRoy took over the leadership, which he continued for several years, and expanded the staff to include Janet Cosgrove (Northwestern) and Nick Lefakis (Asnuntuck), as well as David and Bill.
For the first few seminars the staff was quite small, averaging five members. Two things changed that. First, discussion group sizes were too large, so more group facilitators were needed. Second, the staff began doing more than leading discussion groups. Further expansion occurred as it became evident that there should be a mix of experienced and new staff to allow for constant replenishment.
After the first year there was never a question of having to coax people to be on the staff. Continuing high interest among former participants in joining the seminar staff usually means a long waiting list for this intense and unpaid job. “I remember I had to wait two years to get on the Barnes staff, and at the time I was running another program for the Center for Teaching. That is how hard it was to get selected!” remembered Pat Cook at the 25th anniversary celebration.
Teachers Helping Teachers
In announcing the “Second Annual Spring Seminar, for Teachers, by Teachers”, LeRoy wrote the following:
“The concept is a simple one. As a teacher, you make choices everyday about the content, structure and goals of the courses you teach. Some of these choices have proven to be valuable, some have not. As a teacher, you have certain needs. These needs may be pragmatic or philosophical, material or spiritual, personal or professional. Some of these needs have been or are being met satisfactorily, others are not. As a teacher, you have ideas about teaching, how it is done, how it might be done, how it ought to be done. This conference is an opportunity for you to talk and to listen as others talk about all of >these things. This kind of communication produces change. The change that is produced can improve the quality of our teaching.
You won’t be lectured to by experts; you are the expert. You won’t be told what you should do, you will learn about some things that you might do. You won’t be buried in jargon or theory; you will be free to talk, in plain and simple terms, about the practice of teaching.”
In another memo about the second annual seminar, LeRoy wrote: “Teachers who are striving toward mastery of their craft have much to share with each other, and by bringing teachers together in a relaxed, informal atmosphere to share their successes and their problems, the skills of all can be enhanced.”
“As true today as when it was written. This is exactly what we try to model every minute of every day,” according to Patti Pallis, current Barnes leader.
Barnes leaders have consistently emphasized the importance of maintaining the informal atmosphere. A major goal of the seminar has always been to put colleagues from different campuses in contact with each other. “Fostering those inter-college contacts has been wonderful. It provided a sense of common purpose which has united us both to each other and to all Barnes participants for 25 years” was Peter Ulisse’s (Housatonic) comment at the 25th anniversary. “There is no question that the Barnes Seminar helps people solve problems together. We meet people we’d never meet otherwise. Informal talking about common problems leads to all sorts of ideas,” added Pat Owen (Northwestern).
Spring Seminar to Barnes Seminar?
LeRoy Barnes retired from teaching in 1991. To honor his crucial leadership role in the formation and early years of the Center for Teaching, the Steering Committee renamed the Spring Seminar the Barnes Seminar shortly thereafter. Since this seminar was both his idea and central to his philosophy of promoting faculty development, the committee believed it most appropriate to honor him in this way. LeRoy himself returned for several years to run the seminar. Christina Gotowka (Tunxis), longtime Barnes staffer and a former head of the Center for Teaching, recalled how “LeRoy was so amused that Barnes was leading the Barnes Seminar – it appealed to his great sense of humor.”
Barnes Seminar Nuts and Bolts
For many years, Barnes was held at the Mercy Center in Madison. The Long Island Sound beach location fit well with the desire to create a professional, yet relaxed, atmosphere. Alice Burstein, who took over coordinating the seminar after Barnes retired, explained the allure of the location. “Mercy is on the ocean. When the weather is nice, many group discussions move outdoors. There is nothing more conducive to thinking deeply than sitting beside the ocean. People loved the peace and serenity.” When the Mercy Center closed for extensive renovations, Barnes moved to the Incarnation Center in Ivoryton – another location that provides a professional, yet relaxed, atmosphere.
The seminar has always been held the end of May or beginning of June, and has always started on Tuesday and gone through Thursday. During the 1990s, a staff day was added on Monday to bring the staff together for final organization, planning, and setting up of activities.
Seminar leaders have always interpreted the word “teacher” broadly to include anyone who taught in any way, from librarians to tutors and everyone in between. While almost all attendees have been from Connecticut, for a few years there were reciprocal arrangements where one or two people were accepted from outside the system in return for a space at a faculty workshop in their state.
Finally, Barnes has always included ”borrow me” and “take me” tables for people to share favorite resources on teaching and learning. Participants are encouraged to put their names on things. After all, if someone sees an interesting article or book she/he may wish to talk with the person who brought it. Everyone has always been encouraged to bring social activities, singing voices, walking shoes, and their sense of humor. Individuals make personal connections that often last for years.
Attendees
Information compiled in 2000 showed that just over 380 different people had participated in the Barnes Seminar. Adding twenty additional seminars since, even accounting for people who attend more than once, produces well over 800 total attendees in 35 years! There is still always a waiting list to attend Barnes as participants who have attended go back to their campuses to share the experience, and recommend attendance to their colleagues.
“I attended the first one, this [Barnes 25th Anniversary], and many in-between and I learned things at every single one. Barnes is a gift from teachers to teachers.”
Long-time Barnes staffer Nick Lefakis